🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that could add up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation supportive of the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party leaders lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A top Democratic leader stated the court had once again eroded its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.